Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent reports suggest that, during the 1990s, the EU15 overcame the US as the world largest scientific producing block. In this paper we perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of the evolution of the EU15 and US scientific output and impact throughout the 1990s looking at publications and impact trends by scientific field. Results show that changes of scientific production between the two blocks are associated with a set of scientific fields which grew or declined at a fast rate in the decade. During this period, the EU15 had eight fields of science growing above 10% in relation to the average of the world, corresponding to a 13% of the total papers published, while the US had only four fast growing fields, representing 6% of total output. The situation was exactly reverse for the decline, with the US having more than double the number of scientific fields and relative weight declining above 10% compared to the EU15. Despite this change, the US maintains a distant leadership in impact across all scientific fields. A detailed analysis of the EU15 countries shows some convergence in terms of outputs and impact, but considerable differences among countries remain. These reflect the evolution, not only of their science, technology and higher education systems, but also their integration in the international science system.
منابع مشابه
مصورسازی تولیدات حوزه پزشکی در پایگاه SCOPUS در سطح جهانی با نگاهی به وضعیت جمهوری اسلامی ایران
Introduction: Scientific production in each country is indicative of its development and the scientific journals are considered one of the efficient tools for scientific communication and primary characteristics of a social system development. The present research intends to visualize the distribution of scientific journals and documents in the field of medicine indexed in Scopus database durin...
متن کاملCommentary: Making the transition to action
Objective To examine and compare the research productivity of the European Union, the four “candidate” countries (those currently waiting to join the EU), and the United States in several fields of biomedical sciences. Design A retrospective observational study—bibliometric analysis. Data sources Manuscripts published by authors from each country separately and from each group of countries for ...
متن کاملAssessment and evaluation of scientific Output of Iranian Dental researchers during 2010-2017 in ISC
Abstract Background & aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the scientific outputs of Iranian dental researchers in the ISC citation database during the years 2010-2017. Material & Methods: This research is an applied research that has been done by using co-word analysis which is a kind of content analysis and scientometric methods. The statistical population of the study includes...
متن کاملتاثیر همکاریهای بینالمللی پژوهشی بر کیفیت تولیدات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
Introduction: International collaboration is beneficial for both researchers and institutions and enhances the quality of research output. The present study therefore sought to: 1- investigate the quality of scientific outputs of Tehran University of Medical Sciences produced through international collaboration, and 2- ascertain the most collaborative countries and institutions of the same univ...
متن کاملThe review of the scientific productions of Iran in the field of military psychology and psychiatry on the Scopus database: A scientometric study by 2018
Background and Aim: With the growth of science production in the world, it is crucial to analyze the status of the produced knowledge for use in scientific policymaking. The scientometric method is one of these analytical tools. Given the special circumstances of Iran and the extent of the impact of the imposed war on the Iranian people, one of the scientific fields that can strongly produce kn...
متن کامل